|
paraipanakos (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
doobedoo22
paraipanakos (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
for whom you work for ?
paraipanakos (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
thanks for putting this out man, you rock
juansjovis (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Before they thought Columbus was nuts. The Earth was flat. It had been like this for thousands of years. The reality is whatever rules and laws you have in your head. Maybe you're just one of these many people, who didn't believe Columbus in his time. That was just 500 years ago. Have we suddenly become all-knowing, or are we just arrogant and afraid? We're still the same.
kakoinax (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
вот пидерасты уже удалили вмдюшку...у кого есть пришлите пожалуйста
doobedoo22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The speaker is a fraudster. He tries to make the bogus 'free energy' technologies sound legitimate by mentioning them at the same time as wind and wave power, efficiency and conservation.
So: half the things he's talking about work. But he wants you to buy into the the other half.
*sigh*
ecomafia (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Well Chesh, friend,
You're positively minded, so here's a bit of enlightement on how things work.
To fuse nuclei, take 2 hydrogens, one needs to overcome the "strong force".
Done in tokamaks, nuke blasts and the sun.
All HIGH PRESSURE HIGH ENERGY devices, i.e. very HOT.
None defies energy conservation from relativistic point of view. Mass turns to energy.
Cold fusion is not here yet, at least in a repetitive way.
And hot fusion is "a little too hot".
This is not a "garage project".
cheshire03 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Then why does fusion defy the the most important things about thermodynamics? That is that the output energy of any machine can not exceed the energy put in? Yet a fully functional fusion reactor would do that very thing to a degree that seems impossible. I have faith that one day, humanity will create such a machine. Come to think of it, a fully functinal commercial ready fusion reactor is already in the building stages and is expected to be operational in the next decade.
ecomafia (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Fusion is a *very* controversal subject especially outside of sun's temperature ranges.
Should it happen, then, it'll not defy any of thermodynamics because as in fission, mass and energy are related.
Not everyone achieves fusion when stating so.
It hsppens in hi energy physics labs with a mediocre efficiency. The way is long and folks with serious theory approach have their chances.
Frauds as well.
One UNKNOWN case remains Joseph Papp. Feynman could not debunk it 100% I'm puzzled.
cheshire03 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm not disputing if this guy is a hoaxer, because he may very well be. All I'm arguing is that fusion is something that defies thermodynamics. There is real science proving this, and because of that we can't readily dismiss the idea that no machine could ever do so. Our science continues to grow and we learn new things all the time. To reject something like fusion is to reject our sun, all stars, and even life here on earth. Obviously the laws of thermodynamics need to be re-written. |
