dog agility dog tricks dog stunts dog bloopers frisbee dogs hurdle racing

9/11 Conspiracy - Crash Course #1 of 4

Dog Agility Home
Dog Agility Home

Dog Agility Home
Dog Agility Home

9-11 Conspiracy - Crash Course #1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... 9-11 Conspiracy - Crash Course #2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... 9-11 Conspiracy - Crash Course #3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... 9-11 Conspiracy - Crash Course #4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... What Does a Demolition Look Like?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... Politicians Question 9-11 #1: Max Cleland: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... Part 1 -The building of the World Trade Center -President George Bush claims to have seen the plane crash into the South Tower at the time in which in happened--even though the first crash wasn't televised at the time -Les Robertson (WTC structural engineer) and Frank A. DeMartini (Manager, WTC Construction & Project Management) tell how they built the WTC with plane crashes in mind -Jonathan R. Barnett, Ph.D. (Worcester Polytechnic Institute) says that he had never seen a protected steel structure collapse in a fire -James H. Fetzer, Ph.D. (Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Deluth) and Jeff King (MIT engineer/research scientist) give their synopsis of the WTC collapses. Also: -The melting point of steel -Properties of the WTC steel -Burning temperatures of kerosene-based jet fuel -Temperatures in the WTC on 9-11 -Black smoke as an indicator of an oxygen-poor fire. Part 2 -Eyewitnesses recall multiple "explosions" -NBC's Pat Dawson relates that FDNY's Fire Safety Chief, Albert Turi thought that there were "devices planted in the building" -William Rodriguez (20+ year WTC employee, and last survivor to exit the WTC) gives his statement of multiple explosions from "lower floors" -James H. Fetzer, Ph.D. (Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Deluth) and Jeff King (MIT engineer/research scientist) tell why the WTC collapses had to be the result of demolitions -Morgan Reynolds (ex-labor department economist during President George W. Bush's first term) tells why he thinks that the WTC was the result of a controlled demolition -Larry Silverstein recalls the orders to "Pull" WTC #7 on a PBS documentary Also: -Information about CDI, (Controlled Demolition, Inc.) the company which was hired to remove the remains of the WTC -Actual demolition footage -WTC explosions recorded by Columbia University's seismographs -Evidence of squibs -Only known footage of the first plane hitting the first tower -Pre-positioned explosives would have been necessary -Marvin P. Bush, the president's younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. Part 3 -CNN reporter discusses the possibility of explosives at the base of the towers -Dallas Landmark Tower Demolition -Scott Forbes (IT Specialist - Fiduciary Trust employee, WTC) and William Rodriguez (20+ year WTC employee, and last survivor to exit the WTC) recall strange happenings at the WTC during the weeks prior to 9-11 -William Rodriguez shares what he heard on the 34th floor on 9-11 -Brian Clark (Volunteer Fire Marshall) and Stanley Praimnath (survivor - 81st floor) share their experiences after exiting the south tower. Also: -Evidence of blast damage in the WTC lobby -Power downs and evacuation drills at the WTC prior to 9-11 Part 4 -BBC news update that WTC #7 has collapsed (this footage aired BEFORE #7 actually collapsed) -Larry Silverstein (WTC leaseholder) recalls the orders to "Pull" WTC #7 on a PBS documentary -Rudy Giuliani reveals that he had been given advanced warning that "the World Trade Center was going to collapse" -video of a woman in uniform announcing to the crowd that the tower was "about to collapse" -video of the ground shaking just seconds before the collapse -Danny Jowenko (Dutch professional demolitions expert) reaffirms his statement that he believes that the WTC had to have been brought down by demolition -Thermal hot spots of ground zero--taken on September 16th and September 23rd, 2001 -Evidence of thermite having been used to bring down the WTC -footage of the red-hot rubbel at Ground Zero -Photos of steel buildings which have burned (and never collapsed), including: Caracas, Venezeula: A 56-story office tower burned for 17 hours Taiwan: Building burned for an hour and a half Los Angeles: 62-story Interstate Bank Building burned for four hours Madrid, Spain: 32-story Windsor Building burned for two days Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: The 38-story One Meridian Plaza building burned for 18 hours.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: vicki68

Length: 07:34
Rating: 4.47
Views: 160332

Tags: 11  9-11  9/11  911  center  conspiracy  demolition  inside  job  o'donnell  rosie  september  towers  trade  twin  world  wtc  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

zephranna01 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
those buildings were specifically designed to handle the impact of a large plane hitting them.
zephranna01 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
A few people sacrificed no matter how smart, is nothing to establishing a NWO, there are millions of smart people in the world CJ,and there will be millions more. The conspiracy is very high up, people who are part of it lower down are mostly unaware what their doing is wrong, they are just following orders, they are part of something much bigger than them, they suspect this, but go along with it, mostly because it provides then with job security, and are on a need to know basis.
carljohnson25 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
A building isn't prepared to withstand a plane crash (especially not tall ones), but more build for another purpose like world trade, offices and rooms for people to live in. A plane crash just should not happen.
carljohnson25 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
and why would the government kill their own people and then such educated ones who worked in some of the most well known and important economy centres of the world. And how should they be sure that all the firefighters, FBI agents, demolition experts, scientists, rescue workers, air traffic controllers, high level military contractors would keep this little secret. You know, if its such a big operation, many people would get involved. Come on, some of them would think that such a plan is absurd
zephranna01 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So how do you explain the thermite explosive slag found at the bottom of each tower? The slag was still too hot to approach days after the towers collapsed. Do you realise there were loud explosions heard coming from the basements of each building before they collapsed? Open your mind up to the possibility, that your government could be lying to you.
chrisswansea2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Raoul, did you expect buildings with a floor space of an acre each to fall over sideways? Did you even see these buildings in real life? Neither did they fall vertically either, the first tower's top half was falling downward yes, but at an angle, the top part protruding sideways by many metres.
chrisswansea2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The joints were breaking because the weight of the collapse on the top, weighed much more than any building brought down in controlled demolition. This wouldn't have been designed into the buildings either. Only in America could an attack like this be blamed on your own government. Terrorism has affected most of the countries in the world, but when it come to your shores, it has to be made into something more. That's just the American way. Movies and video games and too much imagination.
chrisswansea2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Design means nothing. Titanic was meant to be unsinkable. Look what happened there. These steel buildings did not collapse due to fire alone, the steel frame on the outside, both sides, had been compromised. That fat guy can point his finger as much as he wants, going on about fire alone is getting you nowhere. Also the steel did not need to melt, just weaken and the protection for the steel would have been smashed away in the impact. Very 2 dimensional thinking professor.
chadwick89x (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hey...T-bone Thomas there...reject...it was built to withstand a 707, not a 767-200...and the South Tower fell first because it was hit much lower and so had much more weight bearing down on the impact floors...and you can't be a retard and say it's impossible for the third building to have fallen cuz you obviously haven't done the research..as for Bush's comment - it is a bit suspicious...However, read your shit before you talk, please I beg you..Have an enjoyable day
jolonui (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Aircraft fuel cannot melt or bend steel. If you notice from all videos, there was not continous burning fires but black smoke. It has also been confirmed again from footage that sulphate can be seen cutting and melting the towers. Samples also confirm this. Not a conspiracy, a fact. To date this has never been answered. Why didnt the other damage buildings fall? I love the lame "softened floors" yet this passed a jumbo crash certificate test required by law.

Dog Agility Home © 2007 All Rights Reserved.